EPA’s Pending NOx Emissions Rule Could Backfire with Major Consequences for Dealers and their Customers
EPA’s proposal presents “Option 1” and “Option 2” to reduce the remaining 1-2% of tailpipe NOx emissions for 2027 and later CMVs. Option 1 is aimed at a 90% reduction in NOx emissions by 2031. Option 2 is an approach aimed at a 75% reduction in the remaining NOx emissions for 2027 and later.
ATD supports standards for cleaner air and healthier communities, which means turning over the fleet to replace older CMVs with newer, greener ones. However, EPA’s Option 1 is an overly ambitious proposal that places this goal at risk, as it will result in significant CMV price increases that could inhibit sales, reduce fleet turnover, and increase the age of the on-road CMV fleet. In fact, EPA’s proposal could increase the cost of heavy-duty diesel trucks by some $42,000, and increase operating costs, making new trucks less affordable.
The trucking industry continues to make the deployment of cleaner, greener CMVs a top priority. According to the Truck & Engine Manufacturers Association, however, Option 1 simply is not feasible and could significantly disrupt new CMV sales if adopted by EPA. While OEMs are making huge investments in alternate fuels and electrification, EPA’s “Option 1” would inhibit new CMV sales, undermining real-world emissions, reliability and safety improvements.
- EPA’s proposed “Option 1” NOx standards could result in a major “pre-buy/no buy,” a significant deferral of new CMV sales, and a spike in older used CMV purchases. As in the past, when emissions standards are too stringent, they can result in major job losses, businesses closures, and a negative impact on potential air quality improvements.
- EPA’s mandate could undermine real-world environmental and safety improvements. Today’s new CMVs are the cleanest they have ever been. Older CMVs will stay on America’s roads longer and the deployment of valuable new advanced safety technologies could be delayed.
- EPA should finalize a workable version of “Option 2” which would keep new CMVs relatively affordable, reliable and viable for the marketplace, resulting in fleet turnover that could achieve dramatic emissions reductions.